17 Comments

Hi Arjun, Superspiked community: 

There's a lot of interest in coal out there, it would be very interesting to see Arjun's analysis of what's happening in the coal market. Some thoughts for discussion:

- Thermal coal and natural gas prices are linked through the potential for countries to switch from thermal coal to natural gas power generation, we've seen this in the recent effect the price spike in natural gas had on coal consumption (not perfectly linked, but they certainly affect one another). So if we agree with Superspiked's basic premise, that we're in for a period of extremely volatile oil and natural gas prices, this should keep having knock-on effects on thermal coal prices (and even met coal prices, if thermal goes high enough e.g. 2022). So coal should behave in the same sort of supply-constrained, strong-demand, spikey way that natural gas and oil are during this superspike period.  

- This spikey behaviour should contribute to pulses of inflation pressure over the next decade, it's hard to see how this goes any other way. 

- Met coal demand:supply seems imbalanced, even by the IEA's estimation. All the same ESG pressures, permitting delays, image problems, confused public narratives and poor historical returns that have created the current oil and natural gas situation apply to met coal, only moreso. So it would be interesting to see further analysis on coal, the less-discussed cousin of oil and natural gas.  

- Another thing that I've often wondered about, putting the question out there to the group: what do countries outside the OECD think about climate change and the energy transition? What's the view outside the Western culture and media bubble? I get the impression from people like Anas Alhajji that many people in countries outside the OECD view the West's obsession with the climate change topic and increasingly apocalyptic rhetoric skeptically, like the West has collectively hyped ourselves up and gone mad. What do you think?

Expand full comment

I can't believe I have studied energy for over 30 years but paid so little attention to Coal. My mistake. Super interesting sector. I need to do more work on this and likely will need to rely on others to fill in a bunch of gaps.

Expand full comment

Coal is the Rodney Dangefield of fuels - no matter how important it is in reality, it just gets no respect compared to, cool, glamorous oil!

BTW, I've learned so much from your blog and interviews, my group discusses Superspiked posts all the time and never miss an interview you do.

Expand full comment

very kind of you to say. And it is the reaction from subscribers that is hugely motivating so thank you.

Expand full comment

Great article again. Coal mines are the new tobacco stocks. The Aussie miners are cash cows and will be for a long time based on the current strip pricing. Give us a shout when you come down under and we can do a coal mine golf tour.

Expand full comment

Matt, we agree. We referenced this comparison of tobacco and coal stocks in the article we just finished writing on a coal related stock. It gets posted Saturday morning!

We’ll be sending our subscribers to this post of yours, Arjun.

Expand full comment

Thank you! Coal & Golf!..now that's a combination...

Expand full comment

Totally agree

Expand full comment

Great content again Arjun - will you spend some time talking about Saudi Arabia's role as a global energy supplier please? In this messy energy transition era, and Saudi being the lowest cost and lowest emission oil producer and 2nd biggest oil exporter. And, will they develop gas/LNG?

Expand full comment

Thank you Tong! Yes, it is worth spending time on Saudi + UAE + Qatar and how they stack up against other major producers.

Expand full comment

Pure gold: Energy availability, affordability, reliability, and geopolitical security are far and away the most important characteristics of any fuel choice. Full stop. Environmental and climate considerations are only taken into account after primary needs are satisfied. Many of you will agree, though some will disagree. As an analyst, this is objectively not a close call.

Expand full comment

Goddamn outstanding article...sanity! Really appreciate you putting your Wall Street retirement to good use.

Expand full comment

We agree. We love Arjun’s practical take of on these subjects!

Expand full comment

Thank you J J! Really appreciate that.

Expand full comment

... and CH4 has an atmospheric residence time of about 9 years, compared to 100+ years for CO2

Expand full comment

Intelligent energy policy should take account of not only the effect CO2 and CH4 on climate, but also the value of a reliable grid and society’s ability to adapt to a changing climate. The complexity of these factors encourages politicians to make simple rules (“no coal!”). And while it is true that CH4 is a more powerful greenhouse gas from its ability to block certain frequencies of infrared light, it is a far less prevalent GHG than CO2 (~80 ppm vs 400+ ppm).

Expand full comment

100% Weston.

Expand full comment